On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Ted Robinson wrote:
> Thank you very much for the help and ideas for my water temp problem. I
> never would have thought of the water line as a possible adaption for
> water temp. I got all my brass fittings and gauge this AM, to mount the
> sender in one of the exit lines at the thermostat housing. On the way
> home I remembered that on the starboard side of my V-6 block, the drain
> cock was extended out about 6" from the block on a metal tube., (brass I
> hope). So I thought if I could incorporate a brass tee at that point for
> the temp probe, the reading could be more accurate. What do you think? I
> notice the extension tube while doing some rewiring at the starter &
> solenoid, and thought maybe it was to drain past the wire loom that runs
> along the top edge of the oil pan on that side of the engine.
I've thought about putting a sender there as well, but I'm guessing you'd
see some lag and it'll read somewhat low. Since the transducer won't
actually be in the water flowing through the block, the heat will have to
be conducted out along the stagnant water in the pipe, and there might be
some losses due to conduction from the pipe to the air. I can't say how
much the error will be though, so I'm not sure if it would be significant.
Ethan
-- <a href="http://www.engr.wisc.edu/~brodskye/"> Ethan Brodsky </a>Received on Monday, 9 March 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tuesday, 29 July 2014 EDT