Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted

From: Scott Veazie <scottveazie@...>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:18:43 -0700

In that case, go for one of those 225hp v6's they had, very quiet, light, and what a punch with two of them! You could also run a leaner mixture than the 50:1 since the newer units required less oil. The biggest issue would be getting the intermediate housing to mate up to the powerheads.

 

 
> From: Lee.Shuster@...
> To: brodskye@...
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:13:02 -0600
> CC: omc-boats@...
> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted
>
> The problem with the little Chevy inline 4's is their power-to-weight ratio. That's what was so ideal about having the dual 480 two strokes. The were ultra-light, feather-weights!
>
> Another possibility would be to adapt the later OMC 2-stroke V6 outboard engines to an intermediate housing. Then you would have some serious power with very little weight.
>
> OMC apparently once explored this possibility, but found they could buy GM automotive 4, 6, and 8's cheaper than they could built V4 and V6 2-stroke power heads, so they didn't take the idea any further with respect to sterndrives.
>
> Lee
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ethan Brodsky [mailto:brodskye@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:53 AM
> To: Lee Shuster
> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted
>
> Wouldn't it be beautiful with a pair of inline sixes? It'd be no less practical than your typical modern Baja or Donzi (which are absolutely a joke, but who cares?). The hull probably isn't designed for that kind of speed, but trim tabs and maybe a bunch of ballast foward would help. I love the sound of dual engines and the handling would be amazing. Those dual throttles already look sexy - I can't imagine how well the thing would turn when you pinned the outside engine in a corner and cut the inner to idle. You could probably flip it if you got it to dig in in a corner...
>
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Lee Shuster wrote:
>
> > Why not go with a pair of inline Chevy 250 - 6's ? That would push
> > 320 - 340 hp. Don't you just love imagining the project possibilities
> > when it comes to re-powering with OMC's. Of course the length would
> > intrude on usable interior space, but who cares? The CG would move a little forward, which would be good.
> >
> > I haven't run the numbers, but I think you'd have a 50+ mph, yet very reliable outfit.
> > And the Chevy 6's were absolutely bulletproof (MerCruiser sold tons of
> > them). If you wanted to get carried away you could even try
> > retro-fitting the blocks with Pontiac's innovative OHC which came with a QuadraJet 4MV, then you'd be pushing another 100 hp!
> > Exhaust manifolds might be a problem, however.
> >
> > Of course, it would be cheaper just to build out a 383 or 400 small
> > block chevy, but then you would have to push all that thru a single
> > electric stringer, which would greatly reduce reliability.
> >
> > lee
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > __________________________
> > From: omc-boats-bounces@...
> > [mailto:omc-boats-bounces@...]
> > On Behalf Of Scott Veazie
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:48 AM
> > To: omc-boats@...
> > Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted
> >
> > Imagine retrofitting that with two 120-140hp inline Chevy
> > fours....should be able to sqeeze those in....a dual deluxe with around 240-280hp!
> >
> >
> > > From: jdood@...
> > > To: omc-boats@...
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:03:00 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted
> > >
> > > nice, but no windsheild. too bad. if you find out he's parting it
> > > out, i'd love to buy those nav light lenses.
> > >
> > > Jeff D
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Jeff LaCoste wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hope these pics go thru, I ran across one of those rare OMC Dual
> > > > Deluxes outside of Port Townsend WA, so I had to pull over and
> > > > take some pics. I wonder what the plan is here with this boat.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > > <IMG_0100.jpg>
> > > > <IMG_0099.jpg>
> > > > <IMG_0307.jpg>
> > > > <IMG_0311.jpg>
> > > > <IMG_0312.jpg>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jeff LaCoste //
> > > > 206-781-3477 //
> > > > Heavy@...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > OMC-Boats mailing list
> > > > OMC-Boats@...
> > > > http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OMC-Boats mailing list
> > > OMC-Boats@...
> > > http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > __________________________ Insert movie times and more without leaving
> > Hotmail®. See how.
> >
>
> --
> Ethan Brodsky
> _______________________________________________
> OMC-Boats mailing list
> OMC-Boats@...
> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
                                                _________________________________________________________________ Bing™ brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it now. http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurants&form=MLOGEN&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MLOGEN_Core_tagline_local_1x1
--_33464468-48b4-47b1-8e1e-86f3ba88c412_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
In that case, go for&nbsp;one of those 225hp v6's they&nbsp;had, very quiet, light, and what a punch with two of them!&nbsp; You&nbsp;could also run a leaner mixture than the 50:1 since the newer units&nbsp;required less oil.&nbsp; The biggest issue would be getting&nbsp;the intermediate housing to mate up to the powerheads.<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
<BR>&nbsp;<BR>&gt; From: Lee.Shuster@...<BR>&gt; To: brodskye@...<BR>&gt; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:13:02 -0600<BR>&gt; CC: omc-boats@...<BR>&gt; Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; The problem with the little Chevy inline 4's is their power-to-weight ratio. That's what was so ideal about having the dual 480 two strokes. The were ultra-light, feather-weights!<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Another possibility would be to adapt the later OMC 2-stroke V6 outboard engines to an intermediate housing. Then you would have some serious power with very little weight.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; OMC apparently once explored this possibility, but found they could buy GM automotive 4, 6, and 8's cheaper than they could built V4 and V6 2-stroke power heads, so they didn't take the idea any further with respect to sterndrives.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Lee <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>&gt; From: Ethan Brodsky [mailto:brodskye@...] <BR>&gt; Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:53 AM<BR>&gt; To: Lee Shuster<BR>&gt; Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Wouldn't it be beautiful with a pair of inline sixes? It'd be no less practical than your typical modern Baja or Donzi (which are absolutely a joke, but who cares?). The hull probably isn't designed for that kind of speed, but trim tabs and maybe a bunch of ballast foward would help. I love the sound of dual engines and the handling would be amazing. Those dual throttles already look sexy - I can't imagine how well the thing would turn when you pinned the outside engine in a corner and cut the inner to idle. You could probably flip it if you got it to dig in in a corner...<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Ethan<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Lee Shuster wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; Why not go with a pair of inline Chevy 250 - 6's ?&nbsp; That would push <BR>&gt; &gt; 320 - 340 hp.&nbsp;Don't you just&nbsp;love imagining the project possibilities <BR>&gt; &gt; when it comes to re-powering with OMC's.&nbsp; Of course the length would <BR>&gt; &gt; intrude on usable interior space, but who cares? The CG would move a little forward, which would be good.<BR>&gt; &gt; &nbsp;<BR>&gt; &gt; I haven't run the numbers, but I think you'd have a 50+ mph, yet very reliable outfit.<BR>&gt; &gt; And the Chevy 6's were absolutely bulletproof (MerCruiser sold tons of <BR>&gt; &gt; them). If you wanted to get carried away you could even try <BR>&gt; &gt; retro-fitting the blocks with Pontiac's innovative OHC which came with a QuadraJet 4MV, then you'd be pushing another 100 hp!<BR>&gt; &gt; Exhaust manifolds might be a problem, however.<BR>&gt; &gt; &nbsp;<BR>&gt; &gt; Of course, it would be cheaper just to build out a 383 or 400 small <BR>&gt; &gt; block chevy, but then you would have to push all that thru a single <BR>&gt; &gt; electric stringer, which would greatly reduce reliability.<BR>&gt; &gt; &nbsp;<BR>&gt; &gt; lee<BR>&gt; &gt; &nbsp;<BR>&gt; &gt; &nbsp;<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; ______________________________________________________________________<BR>&gt; &gt; __________________________<BR>&gt; &gt; From: omc-boats-bounces@... <BR>&gt; &gt; [mailto:omc-boats-bounces@...]<BR>&gt; &gt; On Behalf Of Scott Veazie<BR>&gt; &gt; Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:48 AM<BR>&gt; &gt; To: omc-boats@...<BR>&gt; &gt; Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; Imagine retrofitting that with two 120-140hp inline Chevy <BR>&gt; &gt; fours....should&nbsp;be able to sqeeze those in....a dual deluxe with around 240-280hp!<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; &nbsp;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; From: jdood@...<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; To: omc-boats@...imate.com<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:03:00 -0700<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; nice, but no windsheild. too bad. if you find out he's parting it <BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; out, i'd love to buy those nav light lenses.<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; Jeff D<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Jeff LaCoste wrote:<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Hope these pics go thru, I ran across one of those rare OMC Dual <BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Deluxes outside of Port Townsend WA, so I had to pull over and <BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; take some pics. I wonder what the plan is here with this boat.<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Jeff<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &lt;IMG_0100.jpg&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &lt;IMG_0099.jpg&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &lt;IMG_0307.jpg&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &lt;IMG_0311.jpg&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &lt;IMG_0312.jpg&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Jeff LaCoste //<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; 206-781-3477 //<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Heavy@...<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; _______________________________________________<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; OMC-Boats@...om<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; _______________________________________________<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; OMC-Boats@...<BR>&gt; &gt; &gt; http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; ______________________________________________________________________<BR>&gt; &gt; __________________________ Insert movie times and more without leaving <BR>&gt; &gt; Hotmail®. See how.<BR>&gt; &gt;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; --<BR>&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.engr.wisc.edu/~brodskye/"&gt; Ethan Brodsky &lt;/a&gt;<BR>&gt; _______________________________________________<BR>&gt; OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>&gt; OMC-Boats@...<BR>&gt; http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR> <br /><hr />Bing™ brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. <a href='http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurants&form=MLOGEN&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MLOGEN_Core_tagline_local_1x1' target='_new'>Try it now.</a></body>
</html>
--_33464468-48b4-47b1-8e1e-86f3ba88c412_--
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tuesday, 29 July 2014 EDT