I've had an ignition failure in the river and have drifted towards stuff too...not fun, but I always forget that I have an anchor and I can drop that to at least stop me...food for thought anyway.
> From: jdood@...
> To: omc-boats@...
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:18:44 -0700
> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted
>
> haha that's a funny image. hey atleast you didn't have to deal with
> river current bringing you ever closer to pilings or rocks while
> waving the paddle
>
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Doug Julien wrote:
>
> > I think you tilt the non-functioning unit up and keep going. At
> > least you have a second power unit to keep going. Speaking as
> > someone who has waved a paddle madly back and forth in a dead
> > Sportsman about three miles from shore in Lake Michigan (help me!),
> > before the days of cellphones, a second power unit would probably
> > be a plus...
> >
> > But I get your point. If one engine quit while underway, would it
> > wreck anything or just pull the boat to the side?
> >
> > -Doug Julien
> >
> > --- On Wed, 9/23/09, jd <jdood@...> wrote:
> >
> >> From: jd <jdood@...>
> >> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted
> >> To: "Evinrude & Johnson Boats of the 1960's and 70's" <omc-boats@....ultimate.com
> >> >
> >> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 12:12 PM
> >> so in a dual engine set up (never had
> >> one) what happens when something like one of the two shifter
> >> switches goes out? That seems like it could be
> >> disastrous. Or any number of other things go
> >> out on just one engine and not the other while underway?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep 23, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Lee Shuster wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why not go with a pair of inline Chevy 250 - 6's
> >> ? That would push 320 - 340 hp. Don't you just love
> >> imagining the project possibilities when it comes to
> >> re-powering with OMC's. Of course the length would
> >> intrude on usable interior space, but who cares? The CG
> >> would move a little forward, which would be good.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't run the numbers, but I think you'd have a
> >> 50+ mph, yet very reliable outfit. And the Chevy 6's were
> >> absolutely bulletproof (MerCruiser sold tons of them). If
> >> you wanted to get carried away you could even try
> >> retro-fitting the blocks with Pontiac's innovative OHC which
> >> came with a QuadraJet 4MV, then you'd be pushing another 100
> >> hp! Exhaust manifolds might be a problem, however.
> >>>
> >>> Of course, it would be cheaper just to build out a 383
> >> or 400 small block chevy, but then you would have to push
> >> all that thru a single electric stringer, which would
> >> greatly reduce reliability.
> >>>
> >>> lee
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> From: omc-boats-bounces@...
> >> [mailto:omc-boats-bounces@...]
> >> On Behalf Of Scott Veazie
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:48 AM
> >>> To: omc-boats@...
> >>> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted
> >>>
> >>> Imagine retrofitting that with two 120-140hp inline
> >> Chevy fours....should be able to sqeeze those in....a dual
> >> deluxe with around 240-280hp!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> From: jdood@...
> >>>> To: omc-boats@...
> >>>> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:03:00 -0700
> >>>> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe
> >> Spotted
> >>>>
> >>>> nice, but no windsheild. too bad. if you find out
> >> he's parting it
> >>>> out, i'd love to buy those nav light lenses.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jeff D
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Jeff LaCoste wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hope these pics go thru, I ran across one of
> >> those rare OMC Dual
> >>>>> Deluxes outside of Port Townsend WA, so I
> >> had to pull over and take
> >>>>> some pics. I wonder what the plan is here
> >> with this boat.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeff
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <IMG_0100.jpg>
> >>>>> <IMG_0099.jpg>
> >>>>> <IMG_0307.jpg>
> >>>>> <IMG_0311.jpg>
> >>>>> <IMG_0312.jpg>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeff LaCoste //
> >>>>> 206-781-3477 //
> >>>>> Heavy@...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> OMC-Boats mailing list
> >>>>> OMC-Boats@...
> >>>>> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OMC-Boats mailing list
> >>>> OMC-Boats@...
> >>>> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
> >>>
> >>> Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailŪ.
> >> See how. _______________________________________________
> >>> OMC-Boats mailing list
> >>> OMC-Boats@...
> >>> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OMC-Boats mailing list
> >> OMC-Boats@...
> >> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > OMC-Boats mailing list
> > OMC-Boats@...
> > http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
>
> _______________________________________________
> OMC-Boats mailing list
> OMC-Boats@...
> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats
_________________________________________________________________
Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailŪ.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009
--_74384a60-6544-4708-b17b-8ccae10172f9_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I've had an ignition failure in the river and have drifted towards stuff too...not fun, but I always forget that I have an anchor and I can drop that to at least stop me...food for thought anyway.<BR> <BR>> From: jdood@...<BR>> To: omc-boats@...ts.ultimate.com<BR>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:18:44 -0700<BR>> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted<BR>> <BR>> haha that's a funny image. hey atleast you didn't have to deal with <BR>> river current bringing you ever closer to pilings or rocks while <BR>> waving the paddle<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> On Sep 23, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Doug Julien wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > I think you tilt the non-functioning unit up and keep going. At <BR>> > least you have a second power unit to keep going. Speaking as <BR>> > someone who has waved a paddle madly back and forth in a dead <BR>> > Sportsman about three miles from shore in Lake Michigan (help me!), <BR>> > before the days of cellphones, a second power unit would probably <BR>> > be a plus...<BR>> ><BR>> > But I get your point. If one engine quit while underway, would it <BR>> > wreck anything or just pull the boat to the side?<BR>> ><BR>> > -Doug Julien<BR>> ><BR>> > --- On Wed, 9/23/09, jd <jdood@...> wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> >> From: jd <jdood@...><BR>> >> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted<BR>> >> To: "Evinrude & Johnson Boats of the 1960's and 70's" <omc-boats@... <BR>> >> ><BR>> >> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 12:12 PM<BR>> >> so in a dual engine set up (never had<BR>> >> one) what happens when something like one of the two shifter<BR>> >> switches goes out? That seems like it could be<BR>> >> disastrous. Or any number of other things go<BR>> >> out on just one engine and not the other while underway?<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >> On Sep 23, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Lee Shuster wrote:<BR>> >><BR>> >>> Why not go with a pair of inline Chevy 250 - 6's<BR>> >> ? That would push 320 - 340 hp. Don't you just love<BR>> >> imagining the project possibilities when it comes to<BR>> >> re-powering with OMC's. Of course the length would<BR>> >> intrude on usable interior space, but who cares? The CG<BR>> >> would move a little forward, which would be good.<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> I haven't run the numbers, but I think you'd have a<BR>> >> 50+ mph, yet very reliable outfit. And the Chevy 6's were<BR>> >> absolutely bulletproof (MerCruiser sold tons of them). If<BR>> >> you wanted to get carried away you could even try<BR>> >> retro-fitting the blocks with Pontiac's innovative OHC which<BR>> >> came with a QuadraJet 4MV, then you'd be pushing another 100<BR>> >> hp! Exhaust manifolds might be a problem, however.<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> Of course, it would be cheaper just to build out a 383<BR>> >> or 400 small block chevy, but then you would have to push<BR>> >> all that thru a single electric stringer, which would<BR>> >> greatly reduce reliability.<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> lee<BR>> >>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>> From: omc-boats-bounces@...<BR>> >> [mailto:omc-boats-bounces@...ultimate.com]<BR>> >> On Behalf Of Scott Veazie<BR>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:48 AM<BR>> >>> To: omc-boats@...<BR>> >>> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe Spotted<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> Imagine retrofitting that with two 120-140hp inline<BR>> >> Chevy fours....should be able to sqeeze those in....a dual<BR>> >> deluxe with around 240-280hp!<BR>> >>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>>> From: jdood@...<BR>> >>>> To: omc-boats@...<BR>> >>>> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:03:00 -0700<BR>> >>>> Subject: Re: [OMC-Boats] 1964 Dual OMC Deluxe<BR>> >> Spotted<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> nice, but no windsheild. too bad. if you find out<BR>> >> he's parting it<BR>> >>>> out, i'd love to buy those nav light lenses.<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> Jeff D<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Jeff LaCoste wrote:<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> Hope these pics go thru, I ran across one of<BR>> >> those rare OMC Dual<BR>> >>>>> Deluxes outside of Port Townsend WA, so I<BR>> >> had to pull over and take<BR>> >>>>> some pics. I wonder what the plan is here<BR>> >> with this boat.<BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> Jeff<BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> <IMG_0100.jpg><BR>> >>>>> <IMG_0099.jpg><BR>> >>>>> <IMG_0307.jpg><BR>> >>>>> <IMG_0311.jpg><BR>> >>>>> <IMG_0312.jpg><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>> Jeff LaCoste //<BR>> >>>>> 206-781-3477 //<BR>> >>>>> Heavy@...<BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >>>>><BR>> >> _______________________________________________<BR>> >>>>> OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>> >>>>> OMC-Boats@...ists.ultimate.com<BR>> >>>>> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>> _______________________________________________<BR>> >>>> OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>> >>>> OMC-Boats@...<BR>> >>>> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR>> >>><BR>> >>> Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailŪ.<BR>> >> See how. _______________________________________________<BR>> >>> OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>> >>> OMC-Boats@...<BR>> >>> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR>> >><BR>> >> _______________________________________________<BR>> >> OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>> >> OMC-Boats@...<BR>> >> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR>> >><BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>> > OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>> > OMC-Boats@...<BR>> > http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> OMC-Boats mailing list<BR>> OMC-Boats@...<BR>> http://lists.ultimate.com/mailman/listinfo/omc-boats<BR> <br /><hr />Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailŪ. <a href='http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009' target='_new'>See how.</a></body>
</html>
--_74384a60-6544-4708-b17b-8ccae10172f9_--
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tuesday, 29 July 2014 EDT